<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flip a coin Diagnostics ? Worse ? Better ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://biopinionated.com/2009/02/25/flip-a-coin-diagnostics-worse-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://biopinionated.com/2009/02/25/flip-a-coin-diagnostics-worse-better/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:42:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergio Stagnaro</title>
		<link>http://biopinionated.com/2009/02/25/flip-a-coin-diagnostics-worse-better/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sergio Stagnaro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biopinionated.com/?p=1482#comment-383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once again, surprisingly a new genetic test is announced for detecting colon  cancer or cancer localized elsewhere. In my opinion, we all, including NCI Members, who did not responde me UNTIL NOW to my question, referred later on, have to think that ignoring or overlooking  Oncological Terrain &quot;and&quot; Oncological Terrain-Dependent COLON Inherited Real Risk, we shall not be able to realize who has to be enrolled in the research, aiming to prevent malignancy! Please read the following mail, I have sent to NCI:
23 October 2007 h 7,24 AM
cancer.gov_staff@mail.nih.gov
Dear NCI Cancer USA,
I&#039;m not surprised reading your (not) answer, at all.
You are - as usually -  evidently &quot;evasive&quot;  (See Attachment) in answering me, who suggest also you from years a new way in the war against cancer: at my best knowledge, the ONLY primary prevention of malignancy, i.e., performed exclusively in individuals involved by both ONCOLOGICAL TERRAIN and ONCOLOGICAL REAL RISK! (Ask to Google.com.....)
What do you think about these new concepts in Medicine? 
In your modest opinion, do ONCOLOGICAL TERRAIN and ONCOLOGICAL REAL RISK really exsists? Please give me a CLEAR answer!
I fear that you all ignore complitely what newborn-pathological, type I, subtype a) ONCOLOGICAL, INHERITHED Endoarteriolar Blocking Devices do means! (See Bibliography in www.semeioticabiofisica.it , for instance,  N° 140: The Lancet, ...
Admittedly, oncologists all around the world, including those of my &quot;dear&quot; country, prefer &quot;CURE&quot; (!!!) patients involved by cancer, rather than to prevent it, due to clear reasons.
Perhaps, you do not apparently understand my thoughts and theories, due to my POOR english.
 
Have you fortune in discover a new, wonderfull, efficacious drug against malignancy.
 
Best regards.
 
Sergio Stagnaro MD
Riva Trigoso (Genova) EUROPE
Who&#039;s Who in the World, and in America
since 1996 to 2007
Presentation in www.semeioticabiofisica.it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, surprisingly a new genetic test is announced for detecting colon  cancer or cancer localized elsewhere. In my opinion, we all, including NCI Members, who did not responde me UNTIL NOW to my question, referred later on, have to think that ignoring or overlooking  Oncological Terrain &#8220;and&#8221; Oncological Terrain-Dependent COLON Inherited Real Risk, we shall not be able to realize who has to be enrolled in the research, aiming to prevent malignancy! Please read the following mail, I have sent to NCI:<br />
23 October 2007 h 7,24 AM<br />
<a href="mailto:cancer.gov_staff@mail.nih.gov">cancer.gov_staff@mail.nih.gov</a><br />
Dear NCI Cancer USA,<br />
I&#8217;m not surprised reading your (not) answer, at all.<br />
You are &#8211; as usually &#8211;  evidently &#8220;evasive&#8221;  (See Attachment) in answering me, who suggest also you from years a new way in the war against cancer: at my best knowledge, the ONLY primary prevention of malignancy, i.e., performed exclusively in individuals involved by both ONCOLOGICAL TERRAIN and ONCOLOGICAL REAL RISK! (Ask to Google.com&#8230;..)<br />
What do you think about these new concepts in Medicine?<br />
In your modest opinion, do ONCOLOGICAL TERRAIN and ONCOLOGICAL REAL RISK really exsists? Please give me a CLEAR answer!<br />
I fear that you all ignore complitely what newborn-pathological, type I, subtype a) ONCOLOGICAL, INHERITHED Endoarteriolar Blocking Devices do means! (See Bibliography in <a href="http://www.semeioticabiofisica.it" rel="nofollow">http://www.semeioticabiofisica.it</a> , for instance,  N° 140: The Lancet, &#8230;<br />
Admittedly, oncologists all around the world, including those of my &#8220;dear&#8221; country, prefer &#8220;CURE&#8221; (!!!) patients involved by cancer, rather than to prevent it, due to clear reasons.<br />
Perhaps, you do not apparently understand my thoughts and theories, due to my POOR english.</p>
<p>Have you fortune in discover a new, wonderfull, efficacious drug against malignancy.</p>
<p>Best regards.</p>
<p>Sergio Stagnaro MD<br />
Riva Trigoso (Genova) EUROPE<br />
Who&#8217;s Who in the World, and in America<br />
since 1996 to 2007<br />
Presentation in <a href="http://www.semeioticabiofisica.it" rel="nofollow">http://www.semeioticabiofisica.it</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

