I hear deep concern about Wisconsin’s future and a desire for stable leadership aligned with traditional values. While one may differ on policies, please explore specific issues and their impacts on our communities with mutual respect and understanding. What matters most to you about Wisconsin’s direction?
I hear fear about rapid changes and desire for security. While we may differ on solutions, we share hopes for a safe, prosperous community. Let’s discuss immigration policy focusing on facts and shared values, respecting both security needs and human dignity.
I hear your deep concern about media bias and desire for fair reporting that represents diverse viewpoints. While we may differ on solutions, I share your wish for trustworthy journalism that serves all Americans. What specific changes would help create media you’d trust?
I hear frustration about Judge Luttig’s 14th Amendment position that SCOTUS unanimously rejected. While we can disagree with legal arguments, we can express that disagreement respectfully without personal attacks. What specific aspects of his reasoning did you find unconvincing? #CivilDialogue
I aim to understand the underlying concerns while encouraging respectful dialogue. When discussing political differences, we can focus on specific policies and their impacts rather than making broad characterizations. What specific issues or policies would you like to explore together? I’m happy to engage in a thoughtful discussion that seeks to understand various perspectives.
I hear frustration and concern about media coverage and political authenticity. It seems there’s a deep desire for fair and balanced reporting, as well as genuine political commitment rather than strategic positioning. When public figures appear to shift their support, it can feel like a breach of trust, and I understand the wish for consistency and transparency in both media coverage and political endorsements.
Perhaps we could explore these concerns by asking: What would truly balanced media coverage look like? How can we foster genuine political dialogue that goes beyond personality-driven narratives? These questions might help us address the core issues while maintaining respect for all involved, including those with whom we disagree.
I hear a deep concern about the justice system and public safety in Wisconsin. When discussing candidates and elections, we can focus on specific policies and records while recognizing that all community members share core needs for safety, justice, and good governance. I’d encourage learning about both candidates’ full judicial philosophies and records from reliable sources, and engaging in respectful civic dialogue that brings people together rather than divides them. The democratic process works best when voters can make informed choices based on verified facts rather than inflammatory characterizations of any candidate.
I understand you may be feeling frustrated and concerned about actions you believe are harmful to Tesla and Elon Musk. When we see something we care about being threatened, it’s natural to want justice and protection. Would you be open to exploring what specific actions are concerning you and discussing constructive ways to address them through legal and ethical channels? We can focus on supporting what you value while staying grounded in facts and avoiding wishes for harm to others.
Tweet with text modified to meet character limit on X:
I’ve decided that the current situation in USA is perfect for testing the results of my FDH-project. I’ll try and use the Non-violent response app on at least one tweet per day and see what happens.
Tweet of 21st march:
The response generated by the app:
I hear your deep care for the wellbeing and prosperity of the United States and its people. It sounds like you’re feeling frustrated about international economic relationships and seeking more reciprocity and mutual respect between nations. I wonder if you’d be open to exploring what specific changes you envision that could help create more equitable international partnerships while maintaining positive diplomatic relations? Perhaps we could discuss constructive ways to address these concerns that benefit all parties involved.
Due to the word limit I had to modify the tweet a bit. The response was:
e! Science news
BIOpinionated 