Following up on my FDH-project. I’m using my updated Non-violent response app regularly on tweets. The updated app is now public and can be used by anyone. I have also updated the blog-home of the FDH-project.
Tweet today:
App generated response:
I hear your deep concern about fairness in legal processes and desire for political expression to be protected. When legal systems affect political figures, it can feel threatening to democratic values. How might we work toward justice while preserving both accountability and free speech?
Following up on my FDH-project. I’m using my updated Non-violent response app regularly on tweets. The updated app is now public and can be used by anyone. I have also updated the blog-home of the FDH-project.
Tweet today:
App generated response:
I hear the deep pain and concern for public safety in your message. These tragic losses are heartbreaking. I share your desire to prevent violence and protect lives. Perhaps we could explore solutions that honor both security and human dignity?
Following up on my FDH-project. I’m using my updated Non-violent response app on at least one tweet per day. The updated app is now public and can be used by anyone. I have also updated the blog-home of the FDH-project.
Tweet today:
App generated response:
I understand the deep concern about protecting American lives from fentanyl’s devastating impact. While we may differ on policy approaches, we share the goal of keeping communities safe. Let’s explore solutions that unite us in addressing this crisis through constructive dialogue and evidence-based strategies.
Following up on my FDH-project. I’m using my updated Non-violent response app on at least one tweet per day. The updated app which makes responses within the twitter character-limits, is now public and can be used by anyone.
Tweet today:
App generated response:
I hear deep concern about immigration policy changes and their impacts on our communities. When court decisions seem to conflict with democratic choices, it can feel frustrating. What specific immigration solutions would help create both security and fairness for everyone involved?
I hear deep concern about Wisconsin’s future and a desire for stable leadership aligned with traditional values. While one may differ on policies, please explore specific issues and their impacts on our communities with mutual respect and understanding. What matters most to you about Wisconsin’s direction?
I hear fear about rapid changes and desire for security. While we may differ on solutions, we share hopes for a safe, prosperous community. Let’s discuss immigration policy focusing on facts and shared values, respecting both security needs and human dignity.
I hear your deep concern about media bias and desire for fair reporting that represents diverse viewpoints. While we may differ on solutions, I share your wish for trustworthy journalism that serves all Americans. What specific changes would help create media you’d trust?
I hear frustration about Judge Luttig’s 14th Amendment position that SCOTUS unanimously rejected. While we can disagree with legal arguments, we can express that disagreement respectfully without personal attacks. What specific aspects of his reasoning did you find unconvincing? #CivilDialogue
I aim to understand the underlying concerns while encouraging respectful dialogue. When discussing political differences, we can focus on specific policies and their impacts rather than making broad characterizations. What specific issues or policies would you like to explore together? I’m happy to engage in a thoughtful discussion that seeks to understand various perspectives.
I hear frustration and concern about media coverage and political authenticity. It seems there’s a deep desire for fair and balanced reporting, as well as genuine political commitment rather than strategic positioning. When public figures appear to shift their support, it can feel like a breach of trust, and I understand the wish for consistency and transparency in both media coverage and political endorsements.
Perhaps we could explore these concerns by asking: What would truly balanced media coverage look like? How can we foster genuine political dialogue that goes beyond personality-driven narratives? These questions might help us address the core issues while maintaining respect for all involved, including those with whom we disagree.
BIOpinionated 