Following up on my FDH-project. I’m using my updated Non-violent response app on at least one tweet per day. The updated app is now public and can be used by anyone. I have also updated the blog-home of the FDH-project.

Tweet today:

App generated response:

I understand the deep concern about protecting American lives from fentanyl’s devastating impact. While we may differ on policy approaches, we share the goal of keeping communities safe. Let’s explore solutions that unite us in addressing this crisis through constructive dialogue and evidence-based strategies.

Following up on my FDH-project. I’m using my updated Non-violent response app on at least one tweet per day. The updated app which makes responses within the twitter character-limits, is now public and can be used by anyone.

Tweet today:

App generated response:

I hear deep concern about immigration policy changes and their impacts on our communities. When court decisions seem to conflict with democratic choices, it can feel frustrating. What specific immigration solutions would help create both security and fairness for everyone involved?

Following up on my FDH-project. I’m using my updated Non-violent response app on at least one tweet per day.

Tweet today:

App generated response:

I hear deep concern about Wisconsin’s future and a desire for stable leadership aligned with traditional values. While one may differ on policies, please explore specific issues and their impacts on our communities with mutual respect and understanding. What matters most to you about Wisconsin’s direction?

Following up on my FDH-project. I’m using my updated Non-violent response app on at least one tweet per day.

Tweet today:

App generated response:

I hear fear about rapid changes and desire for security. While we may differ on solutions, we share hopes for a safe, prosperous community. Let’s discuss immigration policy focusing on facts and shared values, respecting both security needs and human dignity.

Following up on my FDH-project. I’m using my updated Non-violent response app on at least one tweet per day.

Tweet today:

App generated response:

I hear your deep concern about media bias and desire for fair reporting that represents diverse viewpoints. While we may differ on solutions, I share your wish for trustworthy journalism that serves all Americans. What specific changes would help create media you’d trust?

Following up on my FDH-project. I’m using my updated Non-violent response app on at least one tweet per day.

Tweet today:

App generated response:

I hear frustration about Judge Luttig’s 14th Amendment position that SCOTUS unanimously rejected. While we can disagree with legal arguments, we can express that disagreement respectfully without personal attacks. What specific aspects of his reasoning did you find unconvincing? #CivilDialogue

Following up on my FDH-project. I’m using the Non-violent response app on at least one tweet per day.

Tweet today:

App generated response:

I aim to understand the underlying concerns while encouraging respectful dialogue. When discussing political differences, we can focus on specific policies and their impacts rather than making broad characterizations. What specific issues or policies would you like to explore together? I’m happy to engage in a thoughtful discussion that seeks to understand various perspectives.

Tweet modified to fit the charachter limit:

Following up on my FDH-project. I’m using the Non-violent response app on at least one tweet per day.

Tweet today:

App generated response:

I hear frustration and concern about media coverage and political authenticity. It seems there’s a deep desire for fair and balanced reporting, as well as genuine political commitment rather than strategic positioning. When public figures appear to shift their support, it can feel like a breach of trust, and I understand the wish for consistency and transparency in both media coverage and political endorsements.

Perhaps we could explore these concerns by asking: What would truly balanced media coverage look like? How can we foster genuine political dialogue that goes beyond personality-driven narratives? These questions might help us address the core issues while maintaining respect for all involved, including those with whom we disagree.

Tweet modified to fit the charachter limit:

Following up on my FDH-project. I’m using the Non-violent response app on at least one tweet per day.

Tweet today:

App generated response:

I hear a deep concern about the justice system and public safety in Wisconsin. When discussing candidates and elections, we can focus on specific policies and records while recognizing that all community members share core needs for safety, justice, and good governance. I’d encourage learning about both candidates’ full judicial philosophies and records from reliable sources, and engaging in respectful civic dialogue that brings people together rather than divides them. The democratic process works best when voters can make informed choices based on verified facts rather than inflammatory characterizations of any candidate.

Tweet modified to fit the charachter limit:

Following up on my FDH-project. I’m using the Non-violent response app on at least one tweet per day.

Tweet of 22nd march:

App-generated response:

I understand you may be feeling frustrated and concerned about actions you believe are harmful to Tesla and Elon Musk. When we see something we care about being threatened, it’s natural to want justice and protection. Would you be open to exploring what specific actions are concerning you and discussing constructive ways to address them through legal and ethical channels? We can focus on supporting what you value while staying grounded in facts and avoiding wishes for harm to others.

Tweet with text modified to meet character limit on X: