On BioScience and Life and Such

Archive for 2009|Yearly archive page

Quote-fest 0509

In Uncategorized on May 17, 2009 at 7:54 pm
Dumbledore as portrayed by the late Richard Ha...
Image via Wikipedia

1. From this post on Gene Expression (found via this excellent post):

the study of human genetic variation is in its infancy, and once it hits adolescence it’s going to start becoming a real pain in the ass.

2. From a comment on this post on Anna’s Bones:

My argument, however, was very simple: If you don’t believe in evolution, don’t get the flu shot. It’s hypocritical.

3. From this post on Blind Scientist on scientists as communicators:

We are horrible communicators, most of our websites are dreadful and do no contain any useful information and when we are confronted with a dumb Playboy bombshell we lose the argument. We lose because usually the argument is so ludicrous that we have no patience to explain. We lose because we are unable to communicate in lay terms. We lose because we’re not entertainers or crowd manipulators. We lose because we make our arguments difficult to understand. We lose because we get angry.

4. From “Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone” by J.K. Rowling:

After all, to the well organized mind, death is but the next great adventure. – Professor Dumbledore on p. 215, line 31

5. …………and…..:

…the trouble is, humans do have a knack of choosing precisely those things which are worst for them. – Professor Dumbledore on wanting Money and life extension, p. 215, line 35.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

The slippery slope, maybe not so slippery after all

In Uncategorized on May 9, 2009 at 6:47 pm

post to news.thinkgene.com

Newlywed male same-sex couple at Gaypride 2006...
Image via Wikipedia

I read this (via AnnaBones):

Yesterday, when Gov. John Baldacci (D) signed a marriage equality law, Maine became the fifth state to allow legal same-sex marriage. On the Christian Broadcasting Network today, Pat Robertson responded by claiming that the “ultimate conclusion” of legalizing same-sex marriage would be the legalization of polygamy, bestiality, child molestation and pedophilia. “You mark my words, this is just the beginning in a long downward slide in relation to all the things that we consider to be abhorrent,” said Robertson.

And it occurred to me that the “Slippery slope” argument used when discussing genetic testing (I have used this argument myself) may have this same hysteric dimension…………based on unfounded anxiety (and prejudice ?).

No doubt, there is a definite possibility that our anticipation of discriminative genetic sorting and the incoherent slippery slope argument above share some of the same f(e)ar-fetched elements………..at least as long as democracy and free will/expression prevails.

Could it be the genetic testing slope isn’t slippery at all ? Just a plain good old slope. And maybe it’s not ending in the “brave new world pits of hell”, but rather, going upwards ending in this  city of happy people. Then again maybe neither. What we should expect post the genetic revolution is most probably today’s world with a little less suffering (from disease that is).

Either way, when I see reflections (however twisted) of my own anxiety in crazy, homophobic, christian conservative, right wing nut-heads, it is time to do some serious reconsiderations.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Ten things we didn’t communicate that well

In Uncategorized on May 5, 2009 at 5:34 pm

post to news.thinkgene.com

Title page of the first edition of On the Orig...

As life scientists, we failed in our communication with the rest of the world when our messages became:

1.Survival of the strongest (which was supposed to be survival of the fittest)
2. Abortion is ending human life (when what it really means is not starting one)
3. Our DNA-sequence determines our future (when all it does is give the starting point for our individual continuously changing phenotype).
4. Race is not determined by genes (when it fact it most certainly is).

Update – additions:

5. Science has all of the answers (from FredCoBio).

6. Genetic modification is something only done in the lab (from MrGunn).

7. Most published research findings turn out to be false, and this is the cost of innovation (from MrGunn).

8. “We will cure X in Y years.” Seems a lot of the public has become disillusioned because we still haven’t cured cancer or AIDS, or “made good” on stem cell research (from Shirley Wu, more here).

9. Any exercise will help you lose weight. When the truth is that the exercise needs to be extensive and the right type.

10. Carbohydrates and fat are bad for you. When the truth is that we need a balanced diet containing both fat and carbohydrates (as well as all the other things).

More comments and suggestions most welcome.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Quote of the month April 09

In Uncategorized on April 20, 2009 at 7:39 am
{{Potd/2006-08-30 (en)}}

Image via Wikipedia

From this friendfeed discussion:

is tea the old coffee?

Paulo Nuin, Brasilian (connaiseur of coffee ?) and author of The Blind Scientist.

This should make him happy.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Retraction. I have seen a nanobot, it’s a bacteria

In Uncategorized on April 17, 2009 at 8:51 am

post to news.thinkgene.com

I wrote this previous post complaining that I had not seen biomedical nanobots in spite of predictions from prominent futurists.

A retraction is in place since I just read that a research group had succeeded in remote controlling  bacteria  to go in any desired direction (via H+ magazine, p 12):

To do this, Martel used bacteria that naturally contain magnetic particles. In nature, these particles help the bacteria navigate toward deeper water, away from oxygen. “Those nanoparticles form a chain a bit like a magnetic compass needle,” says Martel. But by changing the surrounding magnetic field using an extended set-up coupled to an MRI machine, Martel and his colleagues were able to make the bacteria propel themselves in any direction they wanted. -from here

How you control a (magnetizised) bacteria with MRI, is beyond me, but I guess this can count as a proof of principle nevertheless.

The medical-nanobot scenario just became much more likely.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Quote-fest 0409

In Uncategorized on April 3, 2009 at 11:22 am

H+ magazine special edition. All quotes below taken from the spring issue of H+ magazine.

hmagazine

1. From Ru Sirius on p.9:

If you embrace these [bio-progressive] rights, expect heavy resistance, because you will find yourself in for a territorial pissing match with most of the leading religions. Religions have traditionally ruled over the “seed” issues – issues around conception, death, the body, self-definition, gender and sexuality. But given the intrusive potentials of advancing technologies, this is a discussion we need to start having now.

2. from Moira A. Gunn on p.27:

….we need to create all this data to figure out who we humans are and how we tick. But unfortunately, we don’t know what data we need for what, and what — in the end — will prove useful. We are still shooting in the dark.

3. From Vernor Vinge on p.31:

The fundamental change that may be taking place humans may not be best characterized as the tool-creating animal but as the only animal that has figured out how to outsource its cognition — how to spread its cognitive abilities into the outside world.

4 + 5. From Alex Lightman on p.33:

If companies are living people, the drop in life expectancy for companies is comparable only to the fastest dying country in the world that is not at war — zimbabwe, where life expectancy has fallen from 60 in 1990 to 34 today.

The moral of the story is that, for those of us in our forties and up, we need to redouble our efforts at birthing problem solving technologies, and we need to make the future happen now or never (at least within the lifetimes of adults in 2008). or we better hope that Vernor Vinge is right and that the Singularity doesn’t require anything close to a healthy economy, in which case those smarter than-us bots can take charge and knock off all of our problems like ducks in a row.

6. From Douglas Rushkoff on p.37:

The way out — as I see it — is to begin making our own money again. I’m not talking barter, but local currency. Money is just an agreement. And the more a community trusts one another, the more effi ciently the moneys they develop can function. We can create units of currency based on anything; if we don’t have grain, we can earn it into existence instead by babysitting, taking care of the elderly, or teaching in a charter school. every hour worked is an “hour” of currency credited to your account.

7. From Jason Stoddard on p. 38:

Let’s be clear on this. We’re not going to wake up in a magical world where iPods and McMansions grow on trees overnight. Before that can happen, every part of today’s value chain has to be overturned. Everything. Production of raw materials, transport and refining, design and engineering, manufacturing, distribution . . . even our own sense of worth.

And there are plenty more. The magazine is highly recommended reading.

Unloading: HPV-vaccination

In Uncategorized on March 25, 2009 at 9:02 am

post to news.thinkgene.com

Genome organization of human papillomavirus ty...

Image via Wikipedia

The national biotechnology-board in my home-country has decided to announce that mandatory HPV-vaccination needs to be postponed. Why ? because “the long term effects are uncertain”.

&%¤#&%%%##** idiots.

This vaccine is probably the most tested vaccine ever. The issues surrounding its use concerns sexuality and young women. These issues are controversial by nature.

There is however, nothing controversial about the proven safety of the vaccine.

The job of an advisory-board of scientifically literate people, is to see beyond the politicized aspects of the matter, not to politicize them more.

The long term effects of a lot of what we do in our everyday lives are uncertain. If you demand 100 % certainty progress stops.

…….and in the meanwhile, many women will develop cervical cancer, some of them will die. Now that is 100 % certain.

Enhanced by Zemanta

One more thing on abortion

In Uncategorized on March 19, 2009 at 2:59 pm

post to news.thinkgene.com

A bar chart depicting selected data from the 1...

Image via Wikipedia

The other day I overheard a conversation. A man says he is proud of staying together with his wife for many, many years. They have four kids, three boys and a girl. He goes on to say that in the early days of their relationship, his wife got pregnant. Since they were both young and had dreams and aspirations for the future, this caused some fierce arguing and they almost broke it off. The abortion (which they disagreed strongly upon, but finally agreed to go through with), the man said had saved their relationship and ……(the use of the following word caught my attention)……enabled them to go on to have 4 kids and a happy marriage.

Nobody can predict the future. Every single little thing we do, every tiny choice we make, shapes our future in unpredictable ways. While abortion can be viewed as taking a life by some, others may view it as choosing not to start one. In this world of uncertain outcomes, choosing not to start a life may enable you to start many others in the future.

Life does not have simple answers. It’s shades of gray. Gray matter.

Enhanced by Zemanta

I haven’t joined Mendeley as community liaison

In Uncategorized on March 18, 2009 at 2:43 pm

From the Blind Scientist:

Despite rumors floating in the upper echelons on the interwebs, I must admit that I haven’t been approached, contacted, persuaded or forced to join Mendeley as a Community Liaison. I understand the rumours were founded on the statement from one of the company’s staff member that my role in the software development is “crucial” (not his exact words, but in the ballpark).I haven’t joined Mendeley as community liaison

You should read the whole article.

Myself, I havent even tried using the program, but I have downloaded it…….

BIOpinionated monthly quote-fest 0309

In Uncategorized on March 16, 2009 at 9:14 pm

1. From this post at cotch dot net:

For eight years, the United States was the brawling village idiot of the developed world, so far as Europe seemed to be concerned.

2. Daniel MacArthur of Genetic Future comments on the claim that scientist shouldn’t study race and intelligence:

Poisoning the well in this fashion is a highly effective strategy for shutting down debate on a particular topic – but this is a terrible strategy for a scientist to adopt.

3. From this post at The Bird’s Brain:

I don’t think science is about skepticism. It is about critical thinking, which is necessary for proper support of skepticism. Yes, be a skeptic, but look at as many sides of an issue as you can, and remember that there are probably others that you have not considered. An opinion is just that, an opinion, not a statement of fact. We all have them, but that doesn’t make us experts.

4. On studying religious faith from this post on Cotch dot net:

What a fascinating way to approach the issue. Not whether an idea is right or wrong; what it has to offer.

5. From this post on Sandwalk:

There are so many crazy people out there that the average skeptic simply doesn’t have time to fight them all.

6. From this news piece on how working women are to blame for the global financial crisis:

Women are twice as likely as men to work in the public sector. They account for two-thirds of the Civil Service and three- quarters of all public employees.

Yet they are barely represented in the useful public services of firefighting and arresting people. Encouraging women to leave the workforce would go a long way towards addressing the budget deficit without any downside whatsoever.

7. From this post on Sandwalk:

We had a really fun time discussing the topic, aided, perhaps, by the excellent wine list at the restaurant. I wish I could remember all the points I made. I think some of them were brilliant.